Why EPA’s own Headquarters Union of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation

Posted by: wulfpro on: March 10, 2011

• In: contaminants | drinking water | ecological threat | elders | enzyme | fluoride | hazardous waste | mutagenic | neurological | neurotoxin | pre-cancerous | public health | surviving fluoride | toxicity
• 1 Comment

Hi, Friends- I’m posting today a link that really blew my mind. I hope you’ll read it, and give it serious thought. It’s why I may never trust government, and I can’t really forgive them if they keep poisoning our children.  Why EPA Headquarters Union of Scientists  Opposes Fluoridation http://www.nteu280.org/Issues/Fluoride/NTEU280-Fluoride.htm Brief synopsis: While researching the toxicity of fluoride, the scientists working for the EPA were horrified at what the EPA was trying to Make THEM perpetrate on citizens, trying to force them to lie about the safety of fluoride. This fully referenced document is their story. They realized that, while they went about their normal duties, they were in danger of being poisoned at work, if they drank the tap water. The EPA refused to give them unfluoridated water to drink–THEY HAD TO SUE THEIR EMPLOYER, THE EPA to give them safe water. And, soon, they had a chilling understanding… EPA scientists:   “We applied EPA’s risk control methodology, … the data leads to a Reference Dose for fluoride of 0.000007 mg/kg-day. The implication for the general public of these calculations is clear. Recent, peer-reviewed toxicity data, when applied to EPA’s standard method for controlling risks from toxic chemicals, require an immediate halt to the use of the nation’s drinking water reservoirs as disposal sites for the toxic waste of the phosphate fertilizer industry… “–from the document Here’s that link again: http://www.nteu280.org/Issues/Fluoride/NTEU280-Fluoride.htm As some of you have heard from me already, I’ve been sending Dover, New Hampshire City Council some material about the poison they add to our water, and calling for them to severely reduce or remove the fluorosilicic acid from our tap water.  I believe they are really confused, and will need help to figure out how to do this. They think they can only “remove” fluoridation by “unfluoridating”, by way of a voter referendum, but I believe they can legally take the amount down to almost zero while we get up petitions. I need help with petitions, too. Neighbors, please consider helping with those. How sick do our kids and elders need to get? To your health, Pat